ETF Screener
| # | ETF | Fund name | Sector | Category | ETF Score | Chg | TER† | AUM† | Flow* | Sharpe† | Track err† | Div yld† | Regime fit | Role | Conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QQQ | Invesco QQQ Trust | Broad Market | INDEX | 92 | from NEUTRAL | 0.20% | $332B | +$7.85B | 1.45 | 0.10% | 0.6% | ALIGNED | SATELLITE | High |
| 2 | XLK | Tech Select Sector | Technology | SECTOR | 89 | +2 top sector | 0.09% | $82B | +$2.9B | 1.38 | — | 0.6% | ALIGNED | SATELLITE | Med |
| 3 | XLY | Cons. Discretionary Select | Cons. Discret. | SECTOR | 88 | −2 labor risk | 0.09% | $22B | +$890M | 1.05 | — | 0.7% | ALIGNED | SATELLITE | Med |
| 4 | GDX | VanEck Gold Miners | Materials | THEMATIC | 87 | from NEUTRAL | 0.51% | $18B | +$410M | 0.60 | — | 1.1% | ALIGNED | TACTICAL | Med |
| 5 | VOO | Vanguard S&P 500 | Broad Market | INDEX | 86 | record close | 0.03% | $490B | +$19.1B | 1.42 | 0.03% | 1.3% | NEUTRAL | CORE | High |
| 6 | SMH | VanEck Semiconductor | Technology | THEMATIC | 86 | from NEUTRAL | 0.35% | $26B | +$1.9B | 0.35 | — | 0.4% | ALIGNED | TACTICAL | Med |
| 7 | VTI | Vanguard Total US | Broad Market | INDEX | 85 | small-cap breadth | 0.03% | $470B | +$8.4B | 1.40 | 0.04% | 1.3% | NEUTRAL | CORE | High |
| 8 | GLD | SPDR Gold Trust | Commodities | THEMATIC | 85 | from NEUTRAL | 0.40% | $109B | −$298M | 1.05 | — | 0.0% | ALIGNED | TACTICAL | Med |
| 9 | IWM | iShares Russell 2000 | Broad Market | INDEX | 84 | from NEUTRAL | 0.19% | $64B | +$180M | 0.48 | 0.08% | 1.3% | ALIGNED | SATELLITE | High |
| 10 | SPY | SPDR S&P 500 | Broad Market | INDEX | 83 | record close | 0.09% | $612B | +$10.4B | 1.41 | 0.05% | 1.3% | NEUTRAL | CORE | High |
| 11 | XLF | Financial Select Sector | Financials | SECTOR | 80 | −6 NIM thesis | 0.09% | $57B | +$1.3B | 0.90 | — | 1.5% | NEUTRAL | SATELLITE | Med |
| 12 | EWY | iShares MSCI South Korea | Emerging Markets | THEMATIC | 78 | +6 flows confirm | 0.59% | $6.8B | +$757M | 0.62 | 0.22% | 1.6% | ALIGNED | TACTICAL | Med |
| 13 | XLC | Comm. Services Select | Comm. Services | SECTOR | 75 | +1 | 0.09% | $19B | +$710M | 0.95 | — | 0.7% | NEUTRAL | SATELLITE | Med |
| 14 | TAN | Invesco Solar | Alternative Energy | THEMATIC | 75 | new entry | 0.67% | $1.2B | n/v | 0.45 | — | 0.3% | ALIGNED | TACTICAL | Med |
| 15 | XLP | Cons. Staples Select | Cons. Staples | SECTOR | 74 | −2 risk-on | 0.09% | $17B | −$450M | 0.52 | — | 2.5% | NEUTRAL | SATELLITE | Med |
| 16 | XLI | Industrial Select Sector | Industrials | SECTOR | 74 | +1 | 0.09% | $22B | +$210M | 0.72 | — | 1.4% | NEUTRAL | SATELLITE | Med |
| 17 | VWO | Vanguard Emerging | Emerging Markets | INDEX | 74 | +2 Korea | 0.08% | $104B | +$1.7B | 0.58 | 0.18% | 2.4% | NEUTRAL | SATELLITE | Med |
| 18 | TLT | iShares 20+Y Treasury | Fixed Income | INDEX | 72 | from COUNTER | 0.15% | $52B | −$620M | 0.10 | 0.06% | 4.5% | NEUTRAL | TACTICAL | Med |
| 19 | MTUM | iShares Momentum | Multi-Sector | INDEX | 72 | +7 factor works | 0.15% | $16B | +$640M | 0.68 | 0.18% | 0.8% | NEUTRAL | TACTICAL | Med |
| 20 | VEA | Vanguard Dev Mkts | International | INDEX | 71 | +1 softer dollar | 0.05% | $149B | +$1.6B | 0.66 | 0.12% | 2.8% | NEUTRAL | SATELLITE | Med |
| 21 | XLU | Utilities Select Sector | Utilities | SECTOR | 70 | from COUNTER | 0.09% | $18B | −$210M | 0.40 | — | 3.0% | NEUTRAL | TACTICAL | Med |
| 22 | AIQ | Global X AI | Technology | THEMATIC | 66 | +8 AI rallied | 0.68% | $2.8B | +$270M | 0.75 | — | 0.4% | NEUTRAL | TACTICAL | Low |
| 23 | XLV | Health Care Select | Healthcare | SECTOR | 62 | led outflows | 0.09% | $41B | −$90M | 0.50 | — | 1.5% | COUNTER | SATELLITE | Med |
| 24 | XLE | Energy Select Sector | Energy | SECTOR | 58 | ALIGNED to COUNTER | 0.09% | $37B | +$900M | 0.80 | — | 3.5% | COUNTER | TACTICAL | High |
Top 3 ETF Picks — regime fit, cost and flow confirmation
Why each fund ranks where it does
The clearest convergence of the period: the Nasdaq gained 5.2% and QQQ drew $7.85 billion in inflows — the single largest ETF inflow of the week. Price leadership and capital flow pointed the same direction, which is exactly the confirmation this screen looks for. Driver: a negative July payrolls print cut September hike odds to 44%, and long-duration growth re-rated immediately. Key risk: the entire move rests on the rate path staying benign — the next inflation print is the test.
Technology reclaimed the top sector spot this period after energy held it previously, and the cheapest broad-tech sleeve in the screen at 0.09% captures it directly. The sector holds roughly 30% year-to-date gains. Key risk: that headline masks a wide split — software is up about 10% since 1 July while the semiconductor sub-sector fell roughly 15% over the same span before this week’s bounce.
Consumer discretionary and technology were the two sectors showing relative outperformance versus the S&P 500 this period. Held Aligned but trimmed two points for a specific reason: the same weak payrolls print that drove this week’s rally is a medium-term warning for this sector specifically. A labour market shedding jobs eventually reaches discretionary spending — the rate relief helps the multiple, not the earnings.
Gold miners were the top-performing industry group of the entire week as gold pushed above $4,400 an ounce. The setup is coherent rather than coincidental: falling rate-hike odds reduce the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset, and miners carry leveraged operating exposure to the metal price. Key risk: that leverage cuts both ways — if the next inflation print revives the hike case, miners give back more than the metal does.
The S&P closed at a record 7,757.64, up 3.6% on the week and a second consecutive weekly gain. The default allocation core at the screen’s lowest fee, capturing the rally without requiring a regime call — which mattered this period, because the regime call itself inverted.
The sharpest reversal in the screen: the semiconductor complex rose more than 7% this period, driving the Nasdaq’s outperformance after closing July with its worst month in over fifteen years. Two honest qualifiers keep this Tactical rather than Core: the chip index had fallen roughly 15% since 1 July before this bounce, and many individual names remain down 40–50% for the year. A genuine, powerful rebound — not a repaired trend.
Total-market core adding small and mid-cap breadth over VOO — a genuine advantage this period given the Russell 2000 matched the S&P at +3.52% on the lower expected rate path, at the same rock-bottom 0.03% fee.
Gold pushed above $4,400 an ounce, settling near $4,399.70 and up 2.33% on Friday, rallying four straight sessions to a seven-week high with its biggest one-day gain since February midweek. Upgraded on the falling rate path. Honest tension flagged: the fund recorded roughly $298M of outflows in the most recent reporting week even as the metal rallied — price and flow disagree here, and this edition shows both.
The most informative upgrade in the screen. Last period small caps sat out both the panic and the rebound entirely; this period the Russell 2000 matched the S&P at +3.52%, closing at 3,034.49 and up 1.10% on Friday. Small-cap earnings did not change — the expected rate path did. That makes this sleeve the cleanest single read on what actually drove the week.
The most liquid S&P wrapper, costlier than VOO but unmatched for size and options depth. Same record-close core read; drew $3.64B of inflows in the most recent reporting week.
Downgraded from Aligned after three consecutive editions. The case here was higher-for-longer supporting net interest margin; September hike odds fell from 55% to 44% this period and money markets stopped pricing any 2026 hike before December. Genuinely two-sided now: record index levels help fee-based revenue, but the jobs report showed financial activities shed 14,000 roles in July. Fundamentals unchanged; the macro argument carrying the sector weakened.
Drew $757M of inflows this period as allocators went abroad for semiconductor exposure through Samsung and SK Hynix. A useful cross-check on the chip rebound: capital committed internationally in the same week the US complex bounced 7%, which suggests conviction rather than a domestic short-cover. Confidence raised from Low as flows now corroborate what was previously a single extraordinary price event. Key risk: single-country concentration plus currency exposure.
A genuinely split sleeve holding both Alphabet and Meta, whose post-earnings paths diverged sharply in the prior period and neither of which reported fresh results this week. Held Neutral: the internal split that defined this sleeve has not been re-tested, and a carried divergence is not evidence of resolution.
New entry on a specific, dated policy catalyst: the White House imposed price floors and a 15% tariff on products made from polysilicon — the raw material primarily produced by China — lifting US solar names. Key risk: solar has a long history of sharp policy-driven reversals, this is a small and volatile sector, and no verified individual percentage move was available to size the reaction, so the score reflects the catalyst’s clarity rather than a measured move.
Defensives lag when risk appetite returns and VIX settles at 14.90. No fresh sector catalyst this period; trailing outflows persist. The rate relief helps the bond-proxy characteristics of staples at the margin, which is why this is a trim rather than a downgrade to Counter.
No fresh sector-wide catalyst this period. The countervailing forces are worth naming: a lower rate path helps capital-intensive industrials, but Q2 GDP slowed to a 1.5% annualised rate from 2.1% and payrolls contracted — a softening demand backdrop for the cyclical end of this sleeve.
The Korea allocation benefits from the same semiconductor conviction driving EWY’s inflows, and a softer dollar on the lower rate path is a mild mechanical tailwind for unhedged emerging exposure. The diversified wrapper captures a fraction of EWY’s concentrated bet — hence Neutral rather than Aligned.
Upgraded from Counter, reversing last edition directly. Treasury yields fell after the payrolls miss and September hike odds dropped to 44%, easing the pressure that made long duration untenable. Honest limit on the upgrade: money markets still price a 2026 hike, just later — around December — and trailing flows remain negative. This is pressure relief, not a pivot to easing, which is why it stops at Neutral.
The momentum factor worked cleanly this period after several editions of whipsaw — software and semiconductors, the two most crowded momentum expressions, both led. Upgraded but held at Neutral rather than Aligned: a factor that works because one macro variable moved is not the same as a factor with durable breadth behind it.
Cheap developed-market diversification at 0.05%. A softer dollar on the lower expected rate path is a mild mechanical tailwind for unhedged international exposure, but no fund-specific verified catalyst landed this period.
Upgraded from Counter for the same reason as TLT: this rate-sensitive sector faced a direct headwind while a September hike looked likely, and that probability fell to 44%. Still only Neutral — defensives lag when risk appetite returns and VIX sits near 15, and trailing flows are still negative.
Upgraded off Counter as the AI complex broadly rallied this period — chips up more than 7%, tech the top sector. But the structural objection stands: the highest-fee, thinnest-AUM thematic in the screen, and a basket structure means it cannot discriminate between the winners and losers of whichever split the market is currently pricing. Confidence stays Low.
Downgraded to Counter: healthcare led sector outflows in the reporting week, with only 4 of 11 sectors recording inflows overall. Defensive positioning is being unwound as risk appetite returns. Worth naming the counter-signal honestly: healthcare added 22,000 jobs in July, the strongest of any industry — the fundamentals are not the problem here, the positioning is.
The sharpest reversal in the screen: energy went from the prior edition’s Aligned sector to this week’s weakest, down over 2%, as crude fell on White House signals of a possible agreement with Iran to increase Strait of Hormuz traffic. Chevron lost nearly 5% and independent producers fell 7–8%. Two pieces of context matter: no deal has been announced, so this rests on an expectation and could reverse immediately; and the sector still holds roughly 30% year-to-date gains, so this is a giveback from strength, not a collapse.
Macro Regime — the hawkish trade unwinds
One data point reversed nearly every regime call from the prior edition. The mechanism is unusually clean. The US economy lost 23,000 jobs in July against expectations near 86,000, with May and June revised down by a combined 103,000 — bringing the twelve-month average to just 34,000. Unemployment fell to 4.1%, but only because 264,000 people left the labour force, taking participation to 61.4%, its lowest in over five years.
Markets read a cooling labour market as removing the Fed’s cover to tighten. September hike odds fell from 55% to 44% and money markets no longer price any 2026 hike before December. The S&P closed at a record 7,757.64, up 3.6% on the week; the Nasdaq gained 5.2%; VIX settled at 14.90.
Long-duration assets rallied hardest, rate-sensitive sectors got relief, and — with crude falling on Iran-deal speculation — energy went from the prior edition’s Aligned sector to this week’s weakest.
Category Distribution
| Category | Count | Funds |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | 9 | XLK · XLY · XLF · XLE · XLP · XLC · XLI · XLV · XLU |
| Index | 9 | VOO · VTI · SPY · QQQ · IWM · VEA · VWO · TLT · MTUM |
| Thematic | 6 | SMH · GLD · GDX · EWY · AIQ · TAN |
Regime Fit Distribution
| Fit | Count | Reading | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aligned | 9 | Benefit from a lower expected rate path and the restored risk appetite that followed the payrolls miss. | QQQ · XLK · XLY · SMH · GDX · GLD · IWM · TAN · EWY |
| Neutral | 13 | Broad-market cores and cross-regime sectors. TLT and XLU both upgraded from Counter; XLF downgraded from Aligned. | VOO · VTI · SPY · TLT · XLU · MTUM · AIQ · XLF · XLC · XLP · XLI · VWO · VEA |
| Counter | 2 | XLE reversed from Aligned as energy became the week’s weakest sector on Iran-deal speculation — no deal announced. XLV led sector outflows, with only 4 of 11 sectors seeing inflows. | XLE · XLV |
Every fund appears in exactly one category and one regime-fit bucket: 9 + 9 + 6 = 24 and 9 + 13 + 2 = 24. The prior edition’s cards claimed 10 / 10 / 4 against 23 funds, double-counting SMH and listing EWY in two buckets, and placed XLE under Counter while it was tagged Aligned. All counts here are recomputed from the ranked table rather than carried forward.
Fund Flow Intelligence
The EWY inflow is the useful cross-check: allocators went abroad for semiconductor exposure in the same week the US complex bounced 7%. That is conviction in the chip rebound rather than a domestic short-cover — and it is why EWY’s confidence rises from Low.
An honest tension worth flagging: GLD recorded outflows in the reporting week even as the metal rallied above $4,400 and miners led all industry groups. Flows are trailing and lag price. The gold call here is price- and rate-driven, not flow-confirmed — and this edition shows both rather than only the supportive one.
Change Log — 3 to 7 August 2026
Regime reversal: the July payrolls miss, at −23,000 against expectations near 86,000, cut September hike odds from 55% to 44% and pushed money-market pricing of any 2026 hike out to December. That single data point reversed most of the prior edition’s positioning logic.
Fit transitions (7): SMH Neutral to Aligned on the complex rising 7% · QQQ Neutral to Aligned on the largest inflow of the week · IWM Neutral to Aligned as the Russell matched the S&P · GLD and GDX Neutral to Aligned with gold above $4,400 and miners the top group · TLT and XLU Counter to Neutral as rate pressure eased · XLE Aligned to Counter as the weakest sector · XLV Neutral to Counter after leading outflows.
The downgrade that matters most — XLF: financials leave Aligned after three consecutive editions. The case was higher-for-longer supporting net interest margin; that thesis lost its driver this period. Record index levels still help fee-based revenue, but the jobs report showed financial activities shed 14,000 roles in July. This is the mirror image of the TLT and XLU upgrades — the same variable, moving the same way, with opposite consequences.
New entry (1): TAN enters on a dated policy catalyst — the White House imposed price floors and a 15% tariff on products made from polysilicon, the raw material primarily produced by China, lifting US solar names. Scored on catalyst clarity rather than a measured move: no verified individual percentage figure was available, and none was estimated.
Important caveat on the chip bounce: SMH gained more than 7%, but the semiconductor index had fallen roughly 15% since 1 July and many individual names remain down 40–50% for the year, while the expanded tech-software sleeve is up about 10% over the same span. The intra-tech rotation from semis into software has not been undone by one strong week — which is exactly why SMH is classified Tactical rather than Core.
Housekeeping — count corrections: the prior edition’s category cards claimed 10 Sector, 10 Index and 4 Thematic, totalling 24 against 23 actual funds, double-counting SMH and listing EWY under both Index and Thematic; and the regime cards claimed 4 Aligned and 4 Counter while the underlying tags were 5 and 3, with XLE listed under Counter despite being tagged Aligned. Every count in this edition is recomputed from the table.
Next gate: inflation data lands next and is by broad consensus the deciding input for September — inflation remains at 3.5% while hiring contracts. Super Micro and Applied Materials report in the same window: both direct reads on whether the chip bounce has fundamental support beyond positioning.
Exclusions — did not pass hard filters
| Ticker | Reason excluded |
|---|---|
| SOXL · TQQQ · SQQQ | Leveraged or inverse structure — automatic disqualification regardless of this period’s semiconductor rebound. |
| UVXY · VXX | Volatility products with structural roll decay — automatic disqualification. |
| USO | Futures roll-cost drag; direct sector exposure is preferred, and energy is Counter this period regardless. |
| JEPI | Active covered-call strategy — a methodology mismatch with a passive screen. |
| ARKK | Chronic outflow history and sub-1.0 risk-adjusted return against a 0.75% fee. |
| DIA | Drew $1.90B of inflows this period and is noted in the flow section, but is not in the ranked universe — listed here so the flow reference is not mistaken for a ranked holding. |
Confidence Footnotes
* Flow — web-sourced weekly aggregates. The QQQ, SPY, DIA, EWY and GLD figures are confirmed from dated reporting; remaining flow figures are ESEN engine estimates from the same window and should be read as directional. Where no figure exists the cell reads n/v and contributes nothing to the score.
† TER, AUM, Sharpe, tracking error and dividend yield — structural fund characteristics from issuer fact sheets and ESEN engine computation. These are slow-moving and do not update weekly; only regime fit, flows and score reflect this period.
SMH · XLK — Med despite strong scores. The bounce is verified and large, but follows a roughly 15% decline since 1 July, with many components still down 40–50% year to date. One week does not repair a broken trend.
GLD · GDX — Med: the price move and rate logic are sound, but GLD recorded outflows in the reporting week. Price and flow disagree, and both are shown.
TLT · XLU — Med: upgraded from Counter on genuinely lower hike odds, but money markets still price a 2026 hike, just later. Pressure relief, not a reversal to easing — hence Neutral rather than Aligned.
XLE — High confidence on the downgrade, with the reversal risk named: no Iran agreement has been announced. A breakdown in talks reverses this call immediately, and the sector still holds roughly 30% year-to-date gains.
TAN — Med: a real, dated policy catalyst, but solar has a long history of sharp policy-driven reversals and the sector is small and volatile.
AIQ — Low, unchanged. Upgraded off Counter on the AI rally, but the structural objection stands: highest fee, thinnest AUM, and a basket that cannot discriminate between the winners and losers of whichever split the market is pricing.
Market Context
One data point flipped the regime. The US economy unexpectedly lost 23,000 jobs in July against expectations near 86,000, with May and June revised down by a combined 103,000 — bringing the twelve-month average to just 34,000 and labour-force participation to 61.4%, its lowest in over five years. Markets read a cooling labour market as removing the Fed’s cover to tighten: September rate-hike odds fell from 55% to 44%, and money markets no longer price any 2026 hike before December.
Risk assets responded immediately. The S&P 500 closed at a record 7,757.64, up 3.6% for the week and a second straight gain; the Nasdaq gained 5.2%; the Russell 2000 matched the S&P at +3.52%; and the semiconductor complex rose more than 7%. The Dow added nearly 3% and VIX settled at 14.90. Gold pushed above $4,400 an ounce with miners the week’s top industry group.
Energy went the other way entirely: crude fell as the administration signalled a possible agreement with Iran to increase Strait of Hormuz traffic — no deal announced — leaving energy the weakest S&P sector, down over 2%. The honest qualifier on the whole rally: inflation remains at 3.5%, well above target, Q2 GDP slowed to a 1.5% annualised rate from 2.1%, and the next inflation print is by broad consensus the deciding input for September. Nine of the 24 funds here are aligned to a regime that rests on a single macro variable.
What this run shows
This ETF screener ranks funds on how well they fit the prevailing market regime, weighted against structural quality and cost rather than recent performance alone. The score combines regime alignment, fund structure, risk-adjusted return, capital flows and expense ratio, and every fund carries a role classification — Core, Satellite or Tactical — that reflects how durable the trend behind it actually is. Hard filters exclude leveraged, inverse and single-stock products outright.
The week of 3–7 August produced seven regime-fit transitions from a single data point. QQQ leads at 92 as the only fund where price and flow confirmed each other outright — a 5.2% Nasdaq gain alongside $7.85 billion of inflows, the largest of the week. Gold miners (GDX) at 87 were the top-performing industry group as gold cleared $4,400, and the Russell 2000 sleeve (IWM) at 84 is the most informative upgrade: small caps matched the S&P at +3.52% without any change in small-cap earnings.
Two downgrades carry the run’s real lesson. Energy (XLE) fell from Aligned to Counter, the sharpest reversal in the screen, as crude dropped on Iran-deal speculation — with no agreement announced, meaning it could reverse just as fast. Financials (XLF) left Aligned after three consecutive editions as the higher-for-longer net-interest-margin thesis lost its driver. Both moves trace to the same variable that lifted the top of the table. Nine of 24 funds are now aligned to a regime resting on one macro input, and the next inflation print tests all of them at once. This is a systematic starting point for research, not a recommendation to act.
What does the ESEN ETF score measure?
It weights five inputs: regime alignment at 25%, structural fund quality at 25%, risk-adjusted return at 20%, fund flows at 15% and cost at 15%. That means a cheap, well-structured fund fitting the current regime outranks a recent top performer with a high fee and thin assets. The score measures fit and quality, not trailing return.
What does the regime fit rating mean?
Aligned means the fund benefits from the prevailing rate and risk backdrop. Counter means it works against that backdrop. Neutral covers broad-market cores and sectors that cut across regimes. Because the classification tracks the macro rather than the fund, a rating can flip without anything changing inside the portfolio — which is exactly what happened this period.
What is the difference between Core, Satellite and Tactical roles?
Core funds are broad, cheap and intended as a permanent allocation regardless of regime. Satellite funds add a deliberate tilt around that core. Tactical funds express a specific, time-limited view and warrant the smallest position size, because the trend behind them has not proven durable. Role reflects intended sizing, not conviction in direction.
Which ETFs are excluded and why?
Leveraged, inverse and single-stock products are automatically disqualified regardless of performance, as are volatility products with structural roll decay. Funds below $250M in assets, under 200,000 shares of average daily volume, or less than 24 months old also fail the hard filters. Active strategies are excluded as a methodology mismatch with a passive screen.
Why can price and fund flow disagree on the same ETF?
Flow data is a trailing weekly aggregate and lags price. A fund can rally on a fresh catalyst while its reported flows still reflect the prior week’s selling. Gold is the current example: the metal cleared $4,400 and miners led all industry groups, yet GLD showed outflows. Where the two disagree, this screen reports both rather than only the supportive figure.
How often is this ETF screen updated?
The screen is rebuilt weekly. Structural characteristics such as expense ratio, assets and tracking error move slowly and reflect the latest issuer filings; only regime fit, flows and score change week to week. Every category and regime count is recomputed from the ranked table each edition rather than carried forward from the previous run.
Methodology: regime alignment 25%, structural quality 25%, risk-adjusted return 20%, fund flows 15%, cost 15%. Hard filters: assets of at least $250M, average daily volume of at least 200,000 shares, inception at least 24 months ago, and no leveraged, inverse or single-stock products. Regime fit classifies each fund against the prevailing rate and risk backdrop; role reflects intended position sizing given trend durability. All category and regime-fit counts are recomputed from the ranked table each edition rather than carried forward.
Data freshness: regime, price and flow context verified through the 7 August 2026 close; published 13 August 2026. Fund flow figures are trailing weekly aggregates and may lag intraweek reversals; expense ratio, assets and risk statistics reflect the most recent issuer filings. Confirm live values before any action.
For informational and educational purposes only. This is a systematic data output, not investment advice. ESEN Analytics Systems is a research and analytics SaaS platform.